A Review of Meta-analyses About Deception Detection

Weylin R. Sternglanz; Wendy L Morris; Marley Morrow; Joshua Braverman

A Review of Meta-analyses About Deception Detection

Weylin R. Sternglanz
, Wendy L Morris
, Marley Morrow
, Joshua Braverman

College of Psychology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Excerpt

If you have ever read a book or watched a television show depicting lie detection, or have had a casual conversation regarding the best way to figure out if someone is lying, you have likely heard many theories, some of which conflict with each other. Even social psychologists who read journal articles on deception detection studies may find the literature confusing; a PsycInfo search on the term "deception detection" produces 1694 sources including 1251 peer reviewed journal articles. A systematic summary of results across the many studies on this topic may be the best way to make sense of the findings. Meta-analyses are one of the most effective methodological tools of summarizing and quantifying scientific effects across studies.

Original language	American English
Title of host publication	The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication
State	Published - Jan 1 2019

Access to Document

https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319963334

Cite this

@inbook{7d789a2102ae4a19b256a1805a33015c,

title = "A Review of Meta-analyses About Deception Detection",

abstract = " Excerpt If you have ever read a book or watched a television show depicting lie detection, or have had a casual conversation regarding the best way to figure out if someone is lying, you have likely heard many theories, some of which conflict with each other. Even social psychologists who read journal articles on deception detection studies may find the literature confusing; a PsycInfo search on the term {"}deception detection{"} produces 1694 sources including 1251 peer reviewed journal articles. A systematic summary of results across the many studies on this topic may be the best way to make sense of the findings. Meta-analyses are one of the most effective methodological tools of summarizing and quantifying scientific effects across studies.",

author = "Sternglanz, \{Weylin R.\} and Morris, \{Wendy L\} and Marley Morrow and Joshua Braverman",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

booktitle = "The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Review of Meta-analyses About Deception Detection

AU - Sternglanz, Weylin R.

AU - Morris, Wendy L

AU - Morrow, Marley

AU - Braverman, Joshua

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Excerpt If you have ever read a book or watched a television show depicting lie detection, or have had a casual conversation regarding the best way to figure out if someone is lying, you have likely heard many theories, some of which conflict with each other. Even social psychologists who read journal articles on deception detection studies may find the literature confusing; a PsycInfo search on the term "deception detection" produces 1694 sources including 1251 peer reviewed journal articles. A systematic summary of results across the many studies on this topic may be the best way to make sense of the findings. Meta-analyses are one of the most effective methodological tools of summarizing and quantifying scientific effects across studies.

AB - Excerpt If you have ever read a book or watched a television show depicting lie detection, or have had a casual conversation regarding the best way to figure out if someone is lying, you have likely heard many theories, some of which conflict with each other. Even social psychologists who read journal articles on deception detection studies may find the literature confusing; a PsycInfo search on the term "deception detection" produces 1694 sources including 1251 peer reviewed journal articles. A systematic summary of results across the many studies on this topic may be the best way to make sense of the findings. Meta-analyses are one of the most effective methodological tools of summarizing and quantifying scientific effects across studies.

UR - https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facbooks/538

UR - https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319963334

M3 - Chapter

BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication

ER -

A Review of Meta-analyses About Deception Detection

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this