A Worldwide Perspective on the Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in New Zealand

  • Gabriela Tezanos-Pinto
  • , Charles Scott Baker
  • , Kirsty Russell
  • , Karen Martien
  • , Robin W. Baird
  • , Alistair Hutt
  • , Gregory Stone
  • , Antonio A. Mignucci-Giannoni
  • , Susana Caballero
  • , Tetusya Endo
  • , Shane Lavery
  • , Marc Oremus
  • , Carlos Olavarría
  • , Claire Garrigue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) occupy a wide range of coastal and pelagic habitats throughout tropical and temperate waters worldwide. In some regions, "inshore" and "offshore" forms or ecotypes differ genetically and morphologically, despite no obvious boundaries to interchange. Around New Zealand, bottlenose dolphins inhabit 3 coastal regions: Northland, Marlborough Sounds, and Fiordland. Previous demographic studies showed no interchange of individuals among these populations. Here, we describe the genetic structure and diversity of these populations using skin samples collected with a remote biopsy dart. Analysis of the molecular variance from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences (n = 193) showed considerable differentiation among populations (FST = 0.17, ΦST = 0.21, P < 0.001) suggesting little or no female gene flow or interchange. All 3 populations showed higher mtDNA diversity than expected given their small population sizes and isolation. To explain the source of this variation, 22 control region haplotypes from New Zealand were compared with 108 haplotypes worldwide representing 586 individuals from 19 populations and including both inshore and offshore ecotypes as described in the Western North Atlantic. All haplotypes found in the Pacific, regardless of population habitat use (i.e., coastal or pelagic), are more divergent from populations described as inshore ecotype in the Western North Atlantic than from populations described as offshore ecotype. Analysis of gene flow indicated long-distance dispersal among coastal and pelagic populations worldwide (except for those haplotypes described as inshore ecotype in the Western North Atlantic), suggesting that these populations are interconnected on an evolutionary timescale. This finding suggests that habitat specialization has occurred independently in different ocean basins, perhaps with Tursiops aduncus filling the ecological niche of the inshore ecotype in some coastal regions of the Indian and Western Pacific Oceans. © The American Genetic Association. 2008. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-24
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Heredity
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2008

Funding

Logistic support in New Zealand was provided by the Department of Conservation ( Northland, Marlborough Sounds, Hokitika, and Te Anau); specially T. Beauchamp, J. Beachman, A. Walker (DoC Northland), R. Kemper, B. Masser (DoC Te Anau), and D. Neale (DoC Hokitika). Logistic support in the Republic of Kiribati was provided by the National Geographic Magazine, the New England Aquarium, and the government of the Republic of Kiribati. We thank the following for assistance in fieldwork: P. Gay, P. Norris, C. Paterson, R. Gosh, and B. Woodward (Doubtful Sound); C. Carraher, A. Engelhaupt and D. Engelhaupt (Marlborough Sounds); R. Constantine, S. Wells, D. Pouwels, F. Mõurao, J. Brueggeman, K. McLeod, E. Newcombe, A. Fleming, C. Clark, D. Heimeier, J. Jackson, and E. Carroll (Northland); N. Wiseman, K. Stockin, B. Doak, B. Murray and A. Cozens (Hauraki Gulf); N. Wiseman and K. Scollay (Jackson Bay); S. Walsh, J. Ward, L. Bell, M. Iakopo, and S. Tufuga (Samoa); N. Funahashi (Japan); D. L. Webster, A. D. Ligon, and D. J. McSweeney (Hawai‘i). K. Robertson and B. Hancock conducted laboratory analyses of the samples from Hawai‘i and Palmyra. J. Jackson and D. Steel assisted with data analysis. A. Alexander and D. Pouwels reviewed an early version of the manuscript. J. Jackson and 2 anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the final manuscript. Biopsy samples were collected under the following permits and animal ethics protocols: in New Zealand, under permit to C.S.B. from the New Zealand Department of Conservation and animal ethics protocols AEC/ 02/2002/R9 and AEC/02/2005/R334 from the University of Auckland; in Samoa, under permits to C.O. granted by the Ministry of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Police and Prisons Department of the Samoan Government, and the Department of Environment and Heritage (Australia); in New Caledonia to C.G. under letter of authorization 6024-1028-DRN/ENV from the North and South provinces; in French Polynesia to M.O. under permit from the local government and direction d’Environnement; in the Republic of Kiribati to G.S. and the New England Aquarium under permits granted by the local government; in Hawai‘i and Palmyra Atoll to R.W.B. and K.M. under Marine Mammal Protection Act permit 774-1714, National Marine Fisheries Service and CITES permits; in the Caribbean to A.A.M.-G., under Marine Mammal Protection Act permits 779-1339, 779-1633, 774-1714 and CITES permits 04US774223/9 and 05US774223/9, issued to the National Marine Fisheries Service, and under permit 04-EPPE-003 from Puerto Rico’s Department of Natural and Environmental Resources and a cooperative agreement with the United States Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources. Northland Marine Mammal Trust; Department of Conservation (Northland) Contract 012438-001-AU1; J. Watson Conservation Trust from the Royal Forest and Bird Society; Postgraduate Tuition Fee Bursary (University of Auckland) and the Whale and Dolphin Adoption Project to G.T.P.; Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand to C.S.B.; Department of Conservation (West Coast) to K.R; Puerto Rico’s Legislature and Dolphin Quest to A.A.M.-G; and Natural Heritage Trust from the Department of the Environment and Heritage (Australian Government) and International Fund for Animal Welfare to C.O.

FundersFunder number
Bird Society
Department of Environment and Heritage6024-1028-DRN/ENV
Department of the Environment and Heritage
Ministry of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Police and Prisons Department of the Samoan Government
Northland Marine Mammal Trust
Palmyra Atoll
Puerto Rico’s Department of Natural and Environmental Resources
Royal Forest
International Fund for Animal Welfare
California Department of Conservation012438-001-AU1
Department of Conservation, New ZealandAEC/ 02/2002/R9, AEC/02/2005/R334
National Marine Fisheries Service779-1339, 04-EPPE-003, 779-1633, 774-1714, 05US774223/9
Royal Society Te Apārangi
The University of Auckland

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • General Medicine

    Keywords

    • Bottlenose dolphin
    • Ecotype
    • Genetic diversity
    • New Zealand
    • Population structure
    • Tursiops truncatus

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Worldwide Perspective on the Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this