Abstract
A major criticism of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III Faces subtest is the number of items, which can be daunting and time-consuming for an impaired client or boring for a normal client. An analysis of several versions, with data from a sample of 50 clinical referrals, revealed that a 32-item subtest was best overall. Using this version, 100% (Faces I) and 94% (Faces II) of the predicted raw scores were less than 4 points away from the actual raw scores, whereas 66% (Faces I) and 70% (Faces II) were less than 2 points away. Limitations of this procedure are discussed.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 142-144 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Assessment |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2002 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Cognition Disorders
- Memory Disorders
- Middle Aged
- Psychometrics
- Regression Analysis
- Reproducibility of Results
- Wechsler Scales.
Disciplines
- Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Abbreviated Form of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III Faces Subtest.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS