After the Accrued Offers Mental Status Evidence, When Does the Prosecution Violate the Privilege of Self-Incrimination by Offering expert testimony Based on the Accused's Court-Ordered Pretrial mental Evaluations?

Mark Dobson

After the Accrued Offers Mental Status Evidence, When Does the Prosecution Violate the Privilege of Self-Incrimination by Offering expert testimony Based on the Accused's Court-Ordered Pretrial mental Evaluations?

Mark Dobson

Shepard Broad College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases
Volume	41
Issue number	1
State	Published - 2013

Cite this

@article{862ea4a4901f40f6bef486b51f0fa124,

title = "After the Accrued Offers Mental Status Evidence, When Does the Prosecution Violate the Privilege of Self-Incrimination by Offering expert testimony Based on the Accused's Court-Ordered Pretrial mental Evaluations?",

author = "Mark Dobson",

year = "2013",

language = "American English",

volume = "41",

journal = "Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases",

issn = "0363-0048",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After the Accrued Offers Mental Status Evidence, When Does the Prosecution Violate the Privilege of Self-Incrimination by Offering expert testimony Based on the Accused's Court-Ordered Pretrial mental Evaluations?

AU - Dobson, Mark

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

M3 - Article

SN - 0363-0048

VL - 41

JO - Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases

JF - Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases

IS - 1

ER -