Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Back from the Brink: The Narratives of Pro-life and Pro-choice Politics

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

Abstract

This conversation will explore the myth of difference invoked in the literature of prochoice and prolife movements. From highlighting the welfare of the unborn and born to claims about women’s mental health needs and arguments regarding coercion and liberty, narratives on each side fight to tell a definitive story about the abortion experience. The rhetoric of each side presents striking similarities, but more importantly, the stories they at times threaten to obfuscate confess surprisingly similar personal stakes and experiences as well. This observation has significant implications regarding how the rhetorical maneuvers that result in legislation for each side ultimately create, utilize, and distort the narrativized experiences of each side, or in other words, it promises to reveal the shared concerns of actors who would otherwise identify each other as “movement” and “countermovement” advocates. For this talk, specifically, we are examining how narrative elements cross boundaries.

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Feb 15 2019
EventCAHSS Intellectual Conversations - Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, United States
Duration: Jul 1 2018Jun 30 2019

Seminar

SeminarCAHSS Intellectual Conversations
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityFort Lauderdale
Period7/1/186/30/19

Disciplines

  • Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Back from the Brink: The Narratives of Pro-life and Pro-choice Politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this