“Big Ideas” of Introductory Chemistry and Biology Courses and the Connections between Them

  • Zahilyn Roche
  • , Laura Santiago Caobi
  • , Brittney Pardinas
  • , Andrea Echarri-Gonzalez
  • , Kathryn P. Kohn
  • , Alex T. Kararo
  • , Melanie M. Cooper
  • , Sonia M. Underwood

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Introductory courses are often designed to cover a range of topics with the intent to offer students exposure to the given discipline as preparation to further their study in the same or related disciplines. Unfortunately, students in these courses are often presented with an overwhelming amount of information that may not support their formation of a usable coherent network of knowledge. In this study we conducted a mixed-method sequential exploratory study with students co-enrolled in General Chemistry II and Introductory Biology I to better understand what students perceived to be the “take-home” messages of these courses (i.e., core ideas) and the connections between these courses. We found that students identified a range of ideas from both courses; further analysis of students’ explanations and reasoning revealed that, when students talked about their chemistry ideas, they were more likely to talk about them as having predictive and explanatory power in comparison with reasons provided for their biology big ideas. Furthermore, students identified a number of overlapping ideas between their chemistry and biology courses, such as interactions, reactions, and structures, which have the potential to be used as a starting place to support students building a more coherent network of knowledge.
    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalCBE-Life Sciences Education
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2022 Z. D. R. Allred et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education and The American Society for Cell Biology.

    Funding

    We thank all the students who participated in the interviews and completed the survey and their instructors for granting us access to their courses. We also thank the chemistry education research team at FIU for their input and support throughout the project. In addition, we would like to thank Drs. Timothy N. Abell and Maia Popova for their input and assistance on the development of some of the figures. This work was supported in part by the Association of American Universities’ (AAU) Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the National Science Foundation grants DUE 0816692 (1359818), 1708664, 1708589, 1725609, and 1725520. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or other funding sources.

    FundersFunder number
    National Science Foundation1708589, 1725609, 1359818, DUE 0816692, 1708664, 1725520
    Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
    Florida International University
    Association of American Colleges and Universities
    Aalborg University

      ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

      • Education
      • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology

      Keywords

      • Biology/education
      • Humans
      • Knowledge
      • Learning
      • Problem Solving
      • Students

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of '“Big Ideas” of Introductory Chemistry and Biology Courses and the Connections between Them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this