Abstract
Use of neuroenhancers has been studied in groups ranging from students to surgeons; however, use of cognitive and performance enhancing medications (CPEMs) to improve performance in poker has remained largely overlooked. To assess the use of CPEMs to improve poker performance, a survey of poker players was conducted. Participants were recruited via Internet poker forums; 198 completed the online survey. Approximately 28 % of respondents used prescription CPEMs, with the most commonly used including: amphetamine/dextroamphetamine (62 %), benzodiazepines (20 %), and methylphenidate (20 %). CPEMs were used in poker to focus (73 %), calm nerves (11 %), and stay awake (11 %). Caffeine (71 %), as well as conventionally counter-intuitive substances like marijuana (35 %) and alcohol (30 %) were also reported to enhance poker performance. Non-users of CPEMs were dissuaded from use due to not knowing where to get them (29 %), apprehension about trying them (26 %), and legal or ethical concerns (16 %). Respondents most frequently acquired CPEMs via friends/fellow poker players (52 %), or prescription from physician (38 %). Additionally, greater use of CPEMs was associated with living outside the United States (p = 0.042), prior use of prescription medications for improving non-poker related performance (p < 0.001), and amateur and semi-professional player status (p = 0.035). Unmonitored use of pharmacologically active agents and their methods of acquisition highlight safety concerns in this cohort of poker players, especially among non-professional players. The current state of guidance from national organizations on CPEM use in healthy individuals could impact prescribing patterns.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 835-845 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Gambling Studies |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 8 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015.
Funding
Conflict of interest The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. No financial support was received for this study.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Psychology
Keywords
- adult
- behavior
- addictive
- biomedical enhancement
- central nervous system stimulants
- cognition
- female
- gambling
- health status
- humans
- male
- risk-taking
- young adult
- Gambling
- Poker
- Cognition
- Neuroenhancer
- Medications
Disciplines
- Medicine and Health Sciences
- Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Medical Specialties
- Osteopathic Medicine and Osteopathy
- Psychology