Comparison of Different Magnitudes of Applied Syndesmotic Clamp Force: A Cadaveric Study

Overcompression of the ankle syndesmosis was once thought to be improbable. Recent studies using computerized tomography (CT) however, have demonstarted otherwise; raising pertinent questions regarding the factors associated with and consequences of syndesmotic overcompression. The purpose of the present study was to directly compare different magnitudes of applied clamp force on the coronal reduction of ankle syndesmosis. Eight through-the-knee cadaveric specimens were obtained. Fiducial cannulated screws were placed in the tibia and fibula to standardize placement of the reduction clamp's tines. CT scans were obtained as baseline controls, followed by destabilization of the syndesmosis. Reductions were then performed using a clamp equipped with an inline load cell, and objective forces (60, 80, 100, 120, 140, and 160 N) applied sequentially to each of the specimens. The syndesmosis was fixed with a single quadricortical screw, and CT were scans repeated. Applied clamp forces of 60 and 80 N resulted in lateral fibular displacement and undercompression (42.9% and 57.1%, respectively), whereas forces of 140 and 160 N resulted in medial fibular displacement (p = .011 and p = .001) and overcompression (100%). The smallest mediolateral displacements were observed with 100 and 120 N, respectively. Malreduction assessment with CT was superior to traditional radiographs [r(54) = 0.22; 95% confidence interval –0.04 to 0.45; p = .101]. In our cadaveric model, an applied clamp force of 100 N most effectively mitigated iatrogenic coronal syndesmotic malreduction from under- or overcompression. Although additional research is warranted, based on the data, inherent variabilities in the applied clamp force by surgeons appear to contribute to the unacceptably high coronal syndesmotic malreduction rate