Concurrent and Summary Feedback and the Ability of an Elderly Population to Learn a Limited Weight Bearing Skill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of concurrent feedback and postresponse summary feedback in an elderly population learning a dynamic psychomotor skill. Subjects: Ninety individuals between the ages of 61 and 88. Methods: During the acquisition phase, subjects performed 20 trials using a walker as an assistive device. Weight placed on the right LE was monitored by a PedAlert device placed over the participant's shoe and the number of trials where the subject did not exceed the threshold of 80 lbs was recorded. During the acquisition phase, the subjects were given either concurrent or postresponse summary feedback. In the retention phase, the subjects took additional steps with the walker and the number of correct trials was recorded. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference between concurrent and postresponse summary feedback during the retention phase. Conclusion: The results of this study did not support all conclusions concerning the effectiveness of concurrent feedback and postresponse summary feedback as reported by Schmidt and Winstein.
    Original languageAmerican English
    Pages (from-to)31-34
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

    Keywords

    • Assistive Device
    • Psychomotor Skill
    • Schmidt and Winstein

    Disciplines

    • Medicine and Health Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Concurrent and Summary Feedback and the Ability of an Elderly Population to Learn a Limited Weight Bearing Skill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this