Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the preferred method of treating patients with end-stage renal disease. Transplantation improves the quality of life of the transplant recipient and also results in reduced treatment costs owing to the cost difference between dialysis and the post-transplant immunosuppression medications. Currently, the USA's Medicare program covers immunosuppression medications for 3 years post-transplant for nonelderly, nondisabled patients, and there is currently a proposal to extend this coverage from 3 years to a lifetime for all transplant recipients. Upon expiration of the current 3-year benefit, some patients are unable to afford to pay for the medication on their own, resulting in graft loss and a return to dialysis. This article reviews studies that documented the improvements in long-term transplant outcomes attributable to previous coverage extensions of immunosuppression medications, from both 1-3 years posttransplant for all transplant recipients in 1993 and the coverage extension from 3 years to lifetime for elderly and disabled patients in the year 2000. In addition, previous studies of the potential cost-effectiveness of a lifetime immunosuppression benefit for all patients are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 435-444 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health Policy
- Pharmacology (medical)
Keywords
- Cost-effectiveness
- Immunosuppression medication
- Kidney transplantation
- Medicare
- Public policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of Medicare's coverage of immunosuppression medications for kidney transplant recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS