Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of the comprehensive observations of proprioception (COP): validity, reliability, and factor analysis

  • E. I. Blanche
  • , S. Bodison
  • , M. C. Chang
  • , Gustavo A. Reinoso

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE We developed an observational tool, the Comprehensive Observations of Proprioception (COP), for identifying proprioceptive processing issues in children with developmental disabilities. METHOD Development of the COP underwent three phases. First, we developed items representing proprioceptive functions on the basis of an extensive literature review and consultation with occupational therapists. We then established interrater reliability and content, construct, and criterion validity. Finally, we completed a factor analysis of COP ratings of 130 children with known developmental disabilities. RESULTS Adequate validity and reliability were established. Factor analysis revealed a four-factor model that explained the underlying structure of the measure as it was hypothesized. CONCLUSION The COP is a valid criterion-referenced short observational tool that structures the clinician’s observations by linking a child’s behaviors to areas identified in the literature as relevant to proprioceptive processing. It takes 15 min to administer and can be used in a variety of contexts, such as the home, clinic, and school.
    Original languageAmerican English
    JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
    Volume66
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1800

    Keywords

    • Child
    • Developmental Disabilities
    • Factor Analysis
    • Statistical
    • Female
    • Humans
    • Male
    • Observation
    • Proprioception
    • Reproducibility of Results

    Disciplines

    • Medicine and Health Sciences
    • Occupational Therapy
    • Rehabilitation and Therapy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development of the comprehensive observations of proprioception (COP): validity, reliability, and factor analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this