TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic ophthalmic ultrasound study of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and apraclonidine 0.5% effect on iris configuration
AU - Besada, Eulogio
AU - Reed, Kimberly
AU - Najman, Perla
AU - Shechtman, Diana
AU - Hardigan, Patrick
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Purpose: To analyze, using a diagnostic ophthalmic ultrasound (DOU) (I3 system ABD v2 Diagnosis Ophthalmic Ultrasound, Software Version 5x, Innovative Imaging Inc), possible effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and apraclonidine 0.5% on iris configuration. Methods: Ten subjects (20 and 40 years of age) consented to participate. The peripheral iris, iris root thickness, iris/lens distance and anterior chamber depth were measured by DOU. Baseline and serial measurements at three luminance levels (>6.4 cd/m2, <0.82-0.4 cd/m2 and <0.2-0.02 cd/m2) were obtained periodically during 4 hours. Either one drop of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or apraclonidine 0.5% in one eye vs. a placebo in the contra-lateral eye were instilled following baseline measurements. The observations for each drug were carried out on different days. A model to test for nested random effects, controlling for subject's age, race and sex, was used for statistical analysis. Results: No significant changes in the intraocular anterior segment configuration zones analyzed was observed for brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or apraclonidine 0.5%. Conclusion: Neither brimonidine tartrate 0.2% nor apraclonidine 0.5% appears to have a significant effect on the analyzed iris configuration zones.
AB - Purpose: To analyze, using a diagnostic ophthalmic ultrasound (DOU) (I3 system ABD v2 Diagnosis Ophthalmic Ultrasound, Software Version 5x, Innovative Imaging Inc), possible effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and apraclonidine 0.5% on iris configuration. Methods: Ten subjects (20 and 40 years of age) consented to participate. The peripheral iris, iris root thickness, iris/lens distance and anterior chamber depth were measured by DOU. Baseline and serial measurements at three luminance levels (>6.4 cd/m2, <0.82-0.4 cd/m2 and <0.2-0.02 cd/m2) were obtained periodically during 4 hours. Either one drop of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or apraclonidine 0.5% in one eye vs. a placebo in the contra-lateral eye were instilled following baseline measurements. The observations for each drug were carried out on different days. A model to test for nested random effects, controlling for subject's age, race and sex, was used for statistical analysis. Results: No significant changes in the intraocular anterior segment configuration zones analyzed was observed for brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or apraclonidine 0.5%. Conclusion: Neither brimonidine tartrate 0.2% nor apraclonidine 0.5% appears to have a significant effect on the analyzed iris configuration zones.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/80053970477
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/80053970477#tab=citedBy
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80053970477
SN - 1705-4850
VL - 22
SP - 144
EP - 148
JO - Clinical and Refractive Optometry
JF - Clinical and Refractive Optometry
IS - 7-8
ER -