TY - JOUR
T1 - Elucidation of the more myopic eye in anisometropia
T2 - the interplay of laterality, ocular dominance, and anisometropic magnitude
AU - Jiang, Siyu
AU - Chen, Zheyi
AU - Bi, Hua
AU - Xia, Ruijing
AU - Shen, Ting
AU - Zhou, Ling
AU - Jiang, Jun
AU - Zhang, Bin
AU - Lu, Fan
PY - 2019/7/3
Y1 - 2019/7/3
N2 - This study reveals how, in a myopic anisometrope, the odds of an eye being more myopic are related to laterality, ocular dominance, and magnitude of anisometropia. In 193 subjects, objective refraction was performed with cycloplegia. Sighting, motor, and sensory dominance were determined with the hole-in-the-card test, convergence near-point test, continuous flashing technique, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was used for probability analysis. Seventy percent of the subjects had a right eye that was more myopic, while 30% of them had a more myopic left eye. When the right eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the right eye being more myopic increased to 80% if the anisometropia was less than 3.0 D, and decreased below 70% if anisometropia was beyond 3.0 D. When the left eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the left eye being more myopic increased to above 40% if the anisometropia was less than 4.0 D and decreased below 30% if the anisometropia was beyond 4.0 D. Therefore, between the two eyes of anisometropes, laterality tilts the chance of being more myopic to the right. Being the sensory dominant eye increases an eye’s probability of being more myopic by another 10% if the magnitude of anisometropia is moderate.
AB - This study reveals how, in a myopic anisometrope, the odds of an eye being more myopic are related to laterality, ocular dominance, and magnitude of anisometropia. In 193 subjects, objective refraction was performed with cycloplegia. Sighting, motor, and sensory dominance were determined with the hole-in-the-card test, convergence near-point test, continuous flashing technique, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was used for probability analysis. Seventy percent of the subjects had a right eye that was more myopic, while 30% of them had a more myopic left eye. When the right eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the right eye being more myopic increased to 80% if the anisometropia was less than 3.0 D, and decreased below 70% if anisometropia was beyond 3.0 D. When the left eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the left eye being more myopic increased to above 40% if the anisometropia was less than 4.0 D and decreased below 30% if the anisometropia was beyond 4.0 D. Therefore, between the two eyes of anisometropes, laterality tilts the chance of being more myopic to the right. Being the sensory dominant eye increases an eye’s probability of being more myopic by another 10% if the magnitude of anisometropia is moderate.
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=novaseuniv&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000473609500024&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-45996-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-45996-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 31270453
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 9
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
M1 - 9598
ER -