Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical Use of Cadaveric Images in Anatomical Textbooks, Atlases, and Journals: A Consensus Response From Authors and Editors

  • Joe Iwanaga
  • , Hee Jin Kim
  • , Keiichi Akita
  • , Bari M. Logan
  • , Ralph T. Hutchings
  • , Nicolás Ottone
  • , Yoichi Nonaka
  • , Mahindra Anand
  • , Danny Burns
  • , Vishram Singh
  • , Maria Peris-Celda
  • , Francisco Martinez-Soriano
  • , Nihal Apaydin
  • , Amgad Hanna
  • , Nobutaka Yoshioka
  • , Juan Fernandez-Miranda
  • , Mi Sun Hur
  • , Mohammadali M. Shoja
  • , Farhood Saremi
  • , Francisco Reina
  • Yoko Tabira, Anna Carrera, Jonathan D. Spratt, S. Yen Ho, Shumpei Mori, Noritaka Komune, Koichi Watanabe, Alberto Prats-Galino, Jose De Andrés, Miguel Angel Reina, Peter H. Abrahams, Robert H. Anderson, Soichiro Ibaragi, Marios Loukas, R. Shane Tubbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nowadays, consent to use donor bodies for medical education and research is obtained from the body donors and their families before the donation. Recently, the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) published guidelines that could restrict the appearance of cadaveric images in commercial anatomical resources such as textbooks and other educational products. These guidelines state that the donor must expressly consent to using such images for this purpose. Cadaveric photos and drawings made from dissections of cadavers have been used in anatomy textbooks and atlases for hundreds of years. They are invaluable for anatomy students and clinical/surgical practitioners. The IFAA guidelines should not restrict the use of those older books; to do so would infringe the rights of those seeking knowledge from these resources. As the images in such textbooks and atlases are anonymized and are used for teaching and research, and the donors and their families are informed about this before the donation, we believe no additional consent is needed. It is impossible to separate educational from “commercial” usage entirely in any situation, e.g., publications from publishers and the use of cadavers in medical schools. Therefore, our best efforts to avoid unethical use of cadaveric images by following traditional consent processes are still needed so that more people will reap the benefits from them. As senior textbook/atlas authors/editors from over 10 countries, we believe that using cadaveric images in anatomy textbooks is appropriate, and no additional consent should be necessary. Such usage falls within the good faith of professionals using these invaluable gifts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-225
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology

Keywords

  • anatomy
  • cadaver
  • commercial
  • consent
  • dissection
  • donors
  • medical education
  • medical ethics
  • publishing

Disciplines

  • Anatomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Use of Cadaveric Images in Anatomical Textbooks, Atlases, and Journals: A Consensus Response From Authors and Editors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this