Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

‘Excessive,’ ‘Unnecessary,’ and ‘Shocking to [the] Conscience’: Thurgood Marshall’s Unending Fight Against the Death Penalty

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

Abstract

Thurgood Marshall opposed the death penalty. As the only Supreme Court justice to have litigated a death-penalty case, Marshall knew firsthand the “extraordinary unfairness that ... surrounds the administration of the death penalty.” This knowledge made Marshall a dedicated foe of capital punishment. Whether in the majority or (more often) in dissent, Marshall consistently ruled the death penalty unconstitutional. For Marshall, the matter was clear-cut and obvious: the death penalty was “an excessive and unnecessary punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment.” This talk will explore Marshall’s death penalty jurisprudence, describing his unsuccessful 20-year fight to end capital punishment in America.

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Oct 18 2012
EventCAHSS Intellectual Conversations Lecture Series - Alvin Sherman Library, Fort Lauderdale, United States
Duration: Sep 13 2012Apr 18 2013
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/far_fls/ay2012-2013/

Conference

ConferenceCAHSS Intellectual Conversations Lecture Series
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityFort Lauderdale
Period9/13/124/18/13
Internet address

Disciplines

  • African American Studies
  • Inequality and Stratification
  • Law and Race
  • Race and Ethnicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Excessive,’ ‘Unnecessary,’ and ‘Shocking to [the] Conscience’: Thurgood Marshall’s Unending Fight Against the Death Penalty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this