Abstract
Thurgood Marshall opposed the death penalty. As the only Supreme Court justice to have litigated a death-penalty case, Marshall knew firsthand the “extraordinary unfairness that ... surrounds the administration of the death penalty.” This knowledge made Marshall a dedicated foe of capital punishment. Whether in the majority or (more often) in dissent, Marshall consistently ruled the death penalty unconstitutional. For Marshall, the matter was clear-cut and obvious: the death penalty was “an excessive and unnecessary punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment.” This talk will explore Marshall’s death penalty jurisprudence, describing his unsuccessful 20-year fight to end capital punishment in America.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| State | Published - Oct 18 2012 |
| Event | CAHSS Intellectual Conversations Lecture Series - Alvin Sherman Library, Fort Lauderdale, United States Duration: Sep 13 2012 → Apr 18 2013 https://nsuworks.nova.edu/far_fls/ay2012-2013/ |
Conference
| Conference | CAHSS Intellectual Conversations Lecture Series |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Fort Lauderdale |
| Period | 9/13/12 → 4/18/13 |
| Internet address |
Disciplines
- African American Studies
- Inequality and Stratification
- Law and Race
- Race and Ethnicity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘Excessive,’ ‘Unnecessary,’ and ‘Shocking to [the] Conscience’: Thurgood Marshall’s Unending Fight Against the Death Penalty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS