Abstract
Background/purpose
Skin tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements at 300 MHz provide non-invasive data on free and bound tissue water. TDC-data is available for some body sites, but most is for female forearm. Contrastingly, there are no data on face-skin or comparative data between genders. Our goals were to obtain facial-TDC reference values and determine if TDC-values differ between genders.
Methods
TDC was measured at forehead, cheek, and forearm in 60 young adults (30 men) to a 1.5-mm depth. Measured TDC-values were compared with TDC-values calculated using skin-thickness data.
Results
Measured TDC-values ranged from 39.6 ± 2.9 at male-forehead to 28.2 ± 2.4 at female forearm and were significantly different (P < 0.001) among each site in the order forehead > cheek >forearm. Male TDC-values were greater than female TDC-values (P < 0.01) with differences from 5.6% at forehead to 11.3% at forearm. Calculated TDC-values incorporating site and gender skin-thickness differences yielded TDC-values at the most 3% different from measured values.
Conclusion
Gender differences should be considered in clinical studies in which men and women are included in a common study population with respect to experimental design and data interpretation. This is especially true if absolute TDC-values are of interest rather than changes in TDC-values on the same subject subsequent secondary to an intervention.
Skin tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements at 300 MHz provide non-invasive data on free and bound tissue water. TDC-data is available for some body sites, but most is for female forearm. Contrastingly, there are no data on face-skin or comparative data between genders. Our goals were to obtain facial-TDC reference values and determine if TDC-values differ between genders.
Methods
TDC was measured at forehead, cheek, and forearm in 60 young adults (30 men) to a 1.5-mm depth. Measured TDC-values were compared with TDC-values calculated using skin-thickness data.
Results
Measured TDC-values ranged from 39.6 ± 2.9 at male-forehead to 28.2 ± 2.4 at female forearm and were significantly different (P < 0.001) among each site in the order forehead > cheek >forearm. Male TDC-values were greater than female TDC-values (P < 0.01) with differences from 5.6% at forehead to 11.3% at forearm. Calculated TDC-values incorporating site and gender skin-thickness differences yielded TDC-values at the most 3% different from measured values.
Conclusion
Gender differences should be considered in clinical studies in which men and women are included in a common study population with respect to experimental design and data interpretation. This is especially true if absolute TDC-values are of interest rather than changes in TDC-values on the same subject subsequent secondary to an intervention.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 504-510 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Skin Research and Technology |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2012 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Dermatology
Keywords
- Dielectric constant
- Face skin
- Skin hydration
- Skin moisturization
- Skin thickness
- Skin water
Disciplines
- Dermatology