Impact of classifying reproductive medications as controlled substances: A deep dive into the Louisiana law

  • Karen Berger
  • , Andrew S. Kaplan
  • , Cheri R. Briggs
  • , Jeffery D. Evans
  • , Malcolm J. Broussard

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson's Women's Health Organization over-ruled Roe v Wade and eliminated the federal right to an abortion. This left the regulation of abortion to the states and opened new avenues for state legislatures to modify abortion access. In one such example, the Louisiana legislature passed a law which designated misoprostol and mifepristone, two reproductive medications that are used for abortion, as controlled substances. This article describes the implications of classifying reproductive medications as controlled substances. The impacts of such a designation may impede patient access, delay care, affect privacy, and impose logistical burdens on health care systems. Education and advocacy to prevent undue burden is crucial.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102424
JournalJournal of the American Pharmacists Association
Volume65
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Pharmacists Association®

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pharmacology (nursing)
  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of classifying reproductive medications as controlled substances: A deep dive into the Louisiana law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this