Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation

  • R. Borum
  • , R. Otto
  • , S. Golding

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Psychologists, psychiatrists and other mental health professionals are frequently involved as expert witnesses in legal proceedings. However, clinical judgment and decision making, which play a role in almost all clinical evaluations, have problems and limitations. Mental health professionals who conduct forensic examinations should be aware of these problems and take steps to address them. This article details the limitations of clinical judgment and decision making, and suggests ways to minimize associated problems, thereby improving the validity and utility of forensic evaluations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-76
Number of pages42
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Law
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this