Abstract
Academic incivility can create divisiveness and affect learners’ sustainability towards degree attainment. Therefore, there is a need to empirically assess learner views on what constitutes academic incivility in higher education. To fill this gap, we developed the Incivility Indicators Instrument (i3), a multifaceted scale that measures the extent to which students view cumulative behaviors and dynamics as instances of academic incivility. To examine the reliability and factor structure of the i3, we conducted a two-part study with two samples of adults in the United States who were enrolled in higher education programs. In study 1 (N = 342), we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and found the initial three-factor structure. In study 2, we administered the instrument to a validating sample (N = 510) and examined the stability of the three-factor model and scores through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this study, we describe the results of the study, provide implications, and discuss future directions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 669-684 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Academic Ethics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 20 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Education
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Academic Incivility
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis
- Exploratory Factor Analysis
- Incivility Indicators Instrument (i)
- scale development
Disciplines
- Education
- Arts and Humanities
- Sociology
- Political Science
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Incivility Indicators Instrument (i3): Development and Initial Validation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS