Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incivility Indicators Instrument (i3): Development and Initial Validation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Academic incivility can create divisiveness and affect learners’ sustainability towards degree attainment. Therefore, there is a need to empirically assess learner views on what constitutes academic incivility in higher education. To fill this gap, we developed the Incivility Indicators Instrument (i3), a multifaceted scale that measures the extent to which students view cumulative behaviors and dynamics as instances of academic incivility. To examine the reliability and factor structure of the i3, we conducted a two-part study with two samples of adults in the United States who were enrolled in higher education programs. In study 1 (N = 342), we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and found the initial three-factor structure. In study 2, we administered the instrument to a validating sample (N = 510) and examined the stability of the three-factor model and scores through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this study, we describe the results of the study, provide implications, and discuss future directions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-684
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 20 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Education
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Academic Incivility
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
  • Exploratory Factor Analysis
  • Incivility Indicators Instrument (i)
  • scale development

Disciplines

  • Education
  • Arts and Humanities
  • Sociology
  • Political Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incivility Indicators Instrument (i3): Development and Initial Validation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this