P300 and allocation of attention in dual-tasks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

P300 in dual-tasks has been reported to be distributed reciprocally across the tasks, i.e. larger P300 associated with one task implies smaller P300 associated with the other. In these studies, however, the dual-task stimuli were either presented simultaneously, precluding a direct, within-trial assessment of relative magnitudes of P300, or they were separated by intervals of 1 s or more, thereby minimizing overlap of the ERP epochs, but at the cost of reduced competition for shared processing resources. The present experiment used an inter-stimulus interval of 400 ms between the auditory (tones) and visual (colored LEDs) stimuli that defined the dual-task and found that, when deviant tones elicited a prominent auditory P300, they were followed by a greatly reduced P300 for the deviant LED. The findings were interpreted from viewpoints that considered the effects of neural inhibition versus neural recovery cycles on the amplitude of P300.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)

Keywords

  • Dual-modality
  • Dual-task
  • Event-related potentials
  • Oddball
  • P300
  • P300 inhibition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'P300 and allocation of attention in dual-tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this