Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting grief reactions one year following a mass University shooting: Evaluating dose-response and contextual predictors

  • Andrew J. Smith
  • , Christopher M. Layne
  • , Patrick Coyle
  • , Julie B. Kaplow
  • , Melissa J. Brymer
  • , Robert S. Pynoos
  • , Russell T. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study identifies risk factors for grief following a mass school shooting. Participants (N 5 1,013) completed online questionnaires 3-4 months (Time 1) and 1 year (Time 2) post-shootings. We tested models predicting Time 2 grief reactions, exploring direct and indirect predictive effects of exposure variables (physical and social proximity) through hypothesized peritraumatic mediators (peritraumatic perceived threat to self or others) while controlling for Time 1 grief and posttraumatic stress (PTS) reactions, pretrauma vulnerabilities. Findings demonstrate that closer social proximity predicted higher levels of Time 2 grief, directly and indirectly through increasing peritraumatic perceived threat to others' safety. Physical proximity and peritraumatic threat to self did not predict Time 2 grief reactions. Implications for grief screening instruments and theory building research through identifying risk factors and causal mechanisms are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1024-1043
Number of pages20
JournalViolence and Victims
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Springer Publishing Company.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)
  • Law

Keywords

  • Dose-response
  • Grief
  • Longitudinal
  • PTSD
  • Risk factors
  • School shooting
  • Traumatic bereavement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting grief reactions one year following a mass University shooting: Evaluating dose-response and contextual predictors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this