Reliability of diagnosis in older psychiatric patients using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We conducted one of the few studies that has examined the reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I) with a mixed inpatient and outpatient population of adults 55 years old and over (range, 56-84 years; mean, 67.33 years). All SCID interviews were videotaped or audiotaped and were administered by Master's-level clinicians working toward their doctorate degrees in clinical psychology. Interrater reliability estimates (kappa and percentage agreement) were calculated for current major depressive episode (47% base rate) and the broad diagnostic categories of anxiety disorders (15% base rate) and somatoform disorders (12% base rate). Kappa values were .70, .77, and 1.0. Respective percentage agreement was 85% for major depression, 94% for anxiety disorders, and 100% for somatoform disorders. Overall percentage agreement was 91%. We conclude that the SCID-I can be effectively administered by relatively inexperienced clinicians to diagnose older psychiatric patients reliably. Directions that future research might take are offered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-356
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1993

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • DSM-III-R
  • older adults
  • reliability
  • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of diagnosis in older psychiatric patients using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this