Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Short Form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although numerous studies have investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of the Speech Sounds Perception Tests, few have investigated the qualities of the test make it effective. Different writers have suggested that it may be effective because of interference from earlier syllables and items, an inability to understand speech, fatigue or an inability to match letters and sounds. If the effectiveness is due to fatigue or interference, the lengh of the test (60 items) would contribute to its accuracy. Otherwise, a short form of the test could be as effective. Data from 37 brain-damaged and 21 normal individuals indicated that a 30-item version of the test was slightly more accurate diagnostically than the 60-item form. This suggests that a short form of the test could be used without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy, enabling the clinician to save time in assessing neuropsychological patients.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1977

Keywords

  • Auditory Perception
  • Brain Damage
  • Mental Disorders
  • Psychological Tests
  • Psychometrics
  • Speech

Disciplines

  • Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Short Form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this