Abstract
Considerable progress has been made in the field of transitional justice in recent years, signified by such landmarks as a permanent international criminal court. Unaddressed aspects of transition remain, however, which need serious attention if peace is to be sustainable in the long term. Oppressive political arrangements favor particular segments of society while simultaneously disenfranchising and economically and socially excluding the less powerful. To date, transitional justice initiatives have focused on the cessation of violence, establishing order and correcting civil and political injustices. Social and economic factors have taken second or no place at all. Yet, social and economic grievances can be ‘powder kegs’ that, if left unaddressed, threaten to blow up peace initiatives. Zimbabwe provides empirical evidence of the dangers of marginalizing economic and social imperatives in the transition from repression.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-182 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | The International Journal of Transitional Justice |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2009 |
Keywords
- Zimbabwe
- peace
- socioeconomic rights
- transitional justice
Disciplines
- Peace and Conflict Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sitting on Powder Kegs: Socioeconomic Rights in Transitional Societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS