TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic racism among Black occupational therapy educators and academic leaders: A mixed methods study
AU - Aldridge, Nardia
AU - Hill, Chloe
AU - Maduro, Kyrah
AU - Armand, Lydia
AU - Forero, Hanna
AU - Magana, Dayeli
AU - Berroa, Sofia
AU - Perez, Adriana
PY - 2026/6/16
Y1 - 2026/6/16
N2 - Importance: Research critically examining how systemic racism operates within academic occupational therapy environments is limited, despite its disruption to professional advancement and occupational engagement for Black faculty.
Objective: To examine the lived and measurable experiences of systemic racism among Black occupational therapy educators and academic leaders.
Design: A convergent mixed-methods design used parallel qualitative (hermeneutic phenomenological) and quantitative data collection. Rigor was established through researcher triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking.
Setting: Predominantly White Institutions and Historically Black Colleges and Universities across five U.S. regions.
Participants: A purposive and snowball sample of 58 Black occupational therapy educators and academic leaders.
Outcomes and Measures: Lived experiences, frequency of racism, and the relationship between belonging and systemic racism were evaluated via a 41-item survey and semi-structured interviews.
Results: The final sample included 58 survey respondents and 17 interviewees. Participants reported moderate-to-high levels of racism (63.8%), significantly greater at predominantly White institutions (p p = .016), reduced alignment with workplace values (p = .009), and less favorable workplace support (p Conclusion and Relevance: Systemic racism is a persistent barrier to belonging and career advancement for Black occupational therapy educators. Findings underscore the need for intentional institutional strategies to promote equity, retention, and inclusive academic environments.
AB - Importance: Research critically examining how systemic racism operates within academic occupational therapy environments is limited, despite its disruption to professional advancement and occupational engagement for Black faculty.
Objective: To examine the lived and measurable experiences of systemic racism among Black occupational therapy educators and academic leaders.
Design: A convergent mixed-methods design used parallel qualitative (hermeneutic phenomenological) and quantitative data collection. Rigor was established through researcher triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking.
Setting: Predominantly White Institutions and Historically Black Colleges and Universities across five U.S. regions.
Participants: A purposive and snowball sample of 58 Black occupational therapy educators and academic leaders.
Outcomes and Measures: Lived experiences, frequency of racism, and the relationship between belonging and systemic racism were evaluated via a 41-item survey and semi-structured interviews.
Results: The final sample included 58 survey respondents and 17 interviewees. Participants reported moderate-to-high levels of racism (63.8%), significantly greater at predominantly White institutions (p p = .016), reduced alignment with workplace values (p = .009), and less favorable workplace support (p Conclusion and Relevance: Systemic racism is a persistent barrier to belonging and career advancement for Black occupational therapy educators. Findings underscore the need for intentional institutional strategies to promote equity, retention, and inclusive academic environments.
M3 - Article
JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT)
JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT)
ER -