Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Critical Role of Spreading Depolarizations in Early Brain Injury: Consensus and Contention

  • R. David Andrew
  • , Jed A. Hartings
  • , Cenk Ayata
  • , K. C. Brennan
  • , Ken D. Dawson-Scully
  • , Eszter Farkas
  • , Oscar Herreras
  • , Sergei A. Kirov
  • , Michael Müller
  • , Nikita Ollen-Bittle
  • , Clemens Reiffurth
  • , Omer Revah
  • , R. Meldrum Robertson
  • , C. William Shuttleworth
  • , Ghanim Ullah
  • , Jens P. Dreier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: When a patient arrives in the emergency department following a stroke, a traumatic brain injury, or sudden cardiac arrest, there is no therapeutic drug available to help protect their jeopardized neurons. One crucial reason is that we have not identified the molecular mechanisms leading to electrical failure, neuronal swelling, and blood vessel constriction in newly injured gray matter. All three result from a process termed spreading depolarization (SD). Because we only partially understand SD, we lack molecular targets and biomarkers to help neurons survive after losing their blood flow and then undergoing recurrent SD. Methods: In this review, we introduce SD as a single or recurring event, generated in gray matter following lost blood flow, which compromises the Na+/K+ pump. Electrical recovery from each SD event requires so much energy that neurons often die over minutes and hours following initial injury, independent of extracellular glutamate. Results: We discuss how SD has been investigated with various pitfalls in numerous experimental preparations, how overtaxing the Na+/K+ ATPase elicits SD. Elevated K+ or glutamate are unlikely natural activators of SD. We then turn to the properties of SD itself, focusing on its initiation and propagation as well as on computer modeling. Conclusions: Finally, we summarize points of consensus and contention among the authors as well as where SD research may be heading. In an accompanying review, we critique the role of the glutamate excitotoxicity theory, how it has shaped SD research, and its questionable importance to the study of early brain injury as compared with SD theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-101
Number of pages19
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 7 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to RDA, an NIH grant (NS106901) to CWS, a National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary grant (K1343777) and EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (739953) to EF and from DFG Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) (DFG DR 323/5-1), DFG DR 323/10-1, and BMBF Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (Era-Net Neuron EBio2, with funds from BMBF 01EW2004) to JPD.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Brain swelling
  • Concussion
  • Dendritic beading
  • Huntington's disease
  • Ischemia
  • Ketamine
  • Migraine
  • Modeling
  • Na/K pump
  • Penumbra
  • Persistent vegetative state
  • Stroke
  • Sudden cardiac arrest
  • Traumatic brain injury

Disciplines

  • Critical Care
  • Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Critical Role of Spreading Depolarizations in Early Brain Injury: Consensus and Contention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this