Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

To Fight or Not to Fight: A Study on the Likelihood of Investor-State Disputes between Two Countries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the importance of the relative positioning of foreign investors’ country and that of the host country in investor-state disputes. We find that investors accustomed to strong institutions at home are more likely to file a dispute against a host state with poorer institutions. Investment disputes are less likely among politically aligned nations and when the host country is dependent on the investor’s country for its exports. Familiarity, facilitated by geographically proximity and language similarity is associated with higher instances of disputes. Our findings highlight the need for a nuanced approach to foreign investment policymaking and reforms that is responsive to the relative positioning of the parties involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-435
Number of pages16
JournalEmerging Markets Finance and Trade
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 25 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Finance
  • General Economics,Econometrics and Finance

Keywords

  • economic proximity
  • F21
  • F23
  • F53
  • F55
  • foreign direct investment
  • geographic distance
  • institutional distance
  • Investor-State dispute
  • K23
  • K33
  • K41
  • P45
  • P48
  • political proximity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Fight or Not to Fight: A Study on the Likelihood of Investor-State Disputes between Two Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this