Abstract
This study investigates the importance of the relative positioning of foreign investors’ country and that of the host country in investor-state disputes. We find that investors accustomed to strong institutions at home are more likely to file a dispute against a host state with poorer institutions. Investment disputes are less likely among politically aligned nations and when the host country is dependent on the investor’s country for its exports. Familiarity, facilitated by geographically proximity and language similarity is associated with higher instances of disputes. Our findings highlight the need for a nuanced approach to foreign investment policymaking and reforms that is responsive to the relative positioning of the parties involved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 420-435 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Emerging Markets Finance and Trade |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 25 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Finance
- General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
Keywords
- economic proximity
- F21
- F23
- F53
- F55
- foreign direct investment
- geographic distance
- institutional distance
- Investor-State dispute
- K23
- K33
- K41
- P45
- P48
- political proximity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To Fight or Not to Fight: A Study on the Likelihood of Investor-State Disputes between Two Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS