Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Traditional Martial Arts versus Modern Self-Defense Training for Women: Some Comments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Most research conducted on women's self-protection strategies has focused on modern self-defense training, as opposed to traditional martial arts instruction. Further, traditional martial arts’ training has been characterized by many as less useful for women than modern self-defense instruction. However, no investigations have compared the effectiveness of these two approaches. Several misconceptions concerning traditional martial arts may explain why this form of self-protection has not been utilized as often, or evaluated as frequently, as other methods. This paper: (1) distinguishes traditional martial arts from modern self-defense training, (2) reviews research that has assessed behavioral outcomes of self-defense training strategies, and (3) discusses factors that influence perceptions and efficacy of such programs. To assist in these efforts, we include the expertise and perspectives of an internationally-recognized grandmaster in the Okinawan martial art of Shorin Ryu Karate. Suggestions for directions that future research in this area might take are offered.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)89-93
Number of pages5
JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Keywords

  • martial arts
  • self-defense
  • self-protection
  • women

Disciplines

  • Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional Martial Arts versus Modern Self-Defense Training for Women: Some Comments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this