Abstract
Most research conducted on women's self-protection strategies has focused on modern self-defense training, as opposed to traditional martial arts instruction. Further, traditional martial arts’ training has been characterized by many as less useful for women than modern self-defense instruction. However, no investigations have compared the effectiveness of these two approaches. Several misconceptions concerning traditional martial arts may explain why this form of self-protection has not been utilized as often, or evaluated as frequently, as other methods. This paper: (1) distinguishes traditional martial arts from modern self-defense training, (2) reviews research that has assessed behavioral outcomes of self-defense training strategies, and (3) discusses factors that influence perceptions and efficacy of such programs. To assist in these efforts, we include the expertise and perspectives of an internationally-recognized grandmaster in the Okinawan martial art of Shorin Ryu Karate. Suggestions for directions that future research in this area might take are offered.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-93 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Aggression and Violent Behavior |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2009 |
Keywords
- martial arts
- self-defense
- self-protection
- women
Disciplines
- Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional Martial Arts versus Modern Self-Defense Training for Women: Some Comments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS