Unpacking the Portmanteau: Megxit’s Implicit Racist Ideology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this essay, we demonstrate the portmanteau’s value as an analytical tool for rhetorical study. We use the portmanteau Megxit as a case study to illustrate how the form of the portmanteau shapes how ideological arguments are presented and received. While portmanteaus are common, particularly in informal speech, we suggest that they can force conceptual associations between source terms that may not otherwise exist. Most importantly, portmanteaus present conceptual associations in a playful and innocuous way, making the portmanteau an ideal form to disguise hateful speech and transmit ideology in a media-friendly package. To demonstrate the ideological work of the portmanteau, we analyze examples of “Megxit” that implicitly evoke race. In doing so, we argue that popular neologisms are a key way that race is materialized in online discourse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)402-417
Number of pages16
JournalWestern Journal of Communication
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Western States Communication Association.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Keywords

  • Ideology
  • implicit racism
  • megxit
  • portmanteau
  • rhetorical criticism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking the Portmanteau: Megxit’s Implicit Racist Ideology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this