TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty
AU - Poniatowski, Lauren H.
AU - Wolf, J. Stuart
AU - Nakada, Stephen Y.
AU - Reihsen, Troy E.
AU - Sainfort, François
AU - Sweet, Robert M.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Purpose: The objective was to determine the acceptability and preliminary construct validity for a high-fidelity synthetic renal pelvis/ureter tissue analogue model for use as a simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Materials and Methods: The pyeloplasty model was designed with incorporated assessment lines for use in post-task Black Light Assessment of Surgical Technique (BLAST)™. Practicing urologists participating in the 2011 and 2012 American Urological Association Mentored Renal Laparoscopy courses performed a simulated laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure and completed a post-task evaluation of the model. Results: Practicing urologists found the model acceptable and rated the model favorably in terms of content and face validity. Urologists who had performed a laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure in the last 5 years outperformed those who had not by demonstrating increased patency (P<0.05), decreased twisting (P<0.05), and decreased leakage (P<0.10) at the anastomosis. Conclusions: The BLAST™ pyeloplasty model demonstrated evidence of acceptability and content, face, and construct validity for training practicing urologists to perform laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
AB - Purpose: The objective was to determine the acceptability and preliminary construct validity for a high-fidelity synthetic renal pelvis/ureter tissue analogue model for use as a simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Materials and Methods: The pyeloplasty model was designed with incorporated assessment lines for use in post-task Black Light Assessment of Surgical Technique (BLAST)™. Practicing urologists participating in the 2011 and 2012 American Urological Association Mentored Renal Laparoscopy courses performed a simulated laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure and completed a post-task evaluation of the model. Results: Practicing urologists found the model acceptable and rated the model favorably in terms of content and face validity. Urologists who had performed a laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure in the last 5 years outperformed those who had not by demonstrating increased patency (P<0.05), decreased twisting (P<0.05), and decreased leakage (P<0.10) at the anastomosis. Conclusions: The BLAST™ pyeloplasty model demonstrated evidence of acceptability and content, face, and construct validity for training practicing urologists to perform laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
KW - Humans
KW - Kidney Pelvis/surgery
KW - Laparoscopy/education
KW - Models, Anatomic
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Ureter/surgery
KW - Urology/education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84896994180
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84896994180#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1089/end.2013.0678
DO - 10.1089/end.2013.0678
M3 - Article
C2 - 24320223
AN - SCOPUS:84896994180
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 28
SP - 393
EP - 398
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
IS - 4
ER -