Abstract
<p> This presentation included arguments for the following claims: <ul> <li> Progressive political and social criticism is conceptually coherent only if an argument can be given showing why some states of affairs are preferable to others. </li> <li> In order to justify the claim that some states of affairs are preferable to others, some minimally realist account of truth must be presupposed. </li> <li> Crude relativism about truth cannot provide a conceptually coherent foundation for progressive criticisms of any state of affairs and, by extension, cannot support justifications for preferring one state of affairs over others. </li> </ul></p>
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| State | Published - Nov 18 2014 |
| Event | CAHSS Intellectual Conversations - Duration: Aug 1 2011 → Jun 1 2012 |
Conference
| Conference | CAHSS Intellectual Conversations |
|---|---|
| Period | 8/1/11 → 6/1/12 |
Disciplines
- Sociology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why Progressives Need a (Minimally) Realist Theory of Truth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS