Why Were Perry Mason's Clients Always Innocent? The Criminal Lawyer's Moral Dilemma―The Criminal Defendant Who Tells His Lawyer He Is Guilty

Randolph Braccialarghe

Why Were Perry Mason's Clients Always Innocent? The Criminal Lawyer's Moral Dilemma―The Criminal Defendant Who Tells His Lawyer He Is Guilty

Randolph Braccialarghe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Valparaiso University Law Review
Volume	39
Issue number	1
State	Published - 2004

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

Why Were Perry Masons Clients Always Innocent The Criminal LawFinal published version, 313 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{4d98fa33d15a48aa823929d0288c8e68,

title = "Why Were Perry Mason's Clients Always Innocent? The Criminal Lawyer's Moral Dilemma―The Criminal Defendant Who Tells His Lawyer He Is Guilty",

author = "Randolph Braccialarghe",

year = "2004",

language = "American English",

volume = "39",

journal = "Valparaiso University Law Review",

issn = "0042-2363",

publisher = "Valparaiso University",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Were Perry Mason's Clients Always Innocent? The Criminal Lawyer's Moral Dilemma―The Criminal Defendant Who Tells His Lawyer He Is Guilty

AU - Braccialarghe, Randolph

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

UR - https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol39/iss1/3

M3 - Article

SN - 0042-2363

VL - 39

JO - Valparaiso University Law Review

JF - Valparaiso University Law Review

IS - 1

ER -

Why Were Perry Mason's Clients Always Innocent? The Criminal Lawyer's Moral Dilemma―The Criminal Defendant Who Tells His Lawyer He Is Guilty

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this